
YouTube / iTunes / Spotify / Radio Public / Pocket Casts / Google Podcasts / Breaker / Overcast
Listen to ArtisanEnglish.jp posts & lesson intros here.
WotD: Constructive criticism
Constructive criticism refers to helpful, specific feedback aimed at fostering improvement rather than causing harm.
It is a valuable tool that helps individuals improve their skills and work.
When appropriately given, constructive criticism encourages growth and positive change.
In our everyday lives, we encounter opportunities for constructive criticism, whether at work, in school, or during personal projects.
When someone provides constructive criticism, they focus on specific areas where improvement can be made, offering clear and actionable suggestions.
This is key.
Constructive criticism must be actionable.
For example, rather than saying, “Your presentation was bad,” a more constructive criticism would be, “You could improve your presentation by including more visuals to engage the audience.”
This approach helps the person receiving the feedback understand precisely what to change and how to do it.
It’s also important to note that receiving constructive criticism can be a challenge for many people.
It’s essential to keep an open mind and recognize that the feedback is meant to help you grow.
Remember, constructive criticism is about making things better.
It is not an attack on your abilities but an opportunity to enhance your skills.
Additionally, giving constructive criticism effectively requires sensitivity and thoughtfulness.
Start with something positive before addressing areas that need improvement.
This method helps create a supportive environment where individuals feel comfortable receiving feedback.
Or you could use the sandwich method, which entails placing constructive criticism between compliments about what someone has done correctly.
In summary, whether you are giving or receiving feedback, always remember the goal: to learn, grow, and succeed together.
Flesch-Kincaid Readability Test
This post is comparable to The New York Times in readability.
It is likely to be understood by a reader with at least a 10th-grade education (age 16).
On the Flesch-Kincaid reading-ease test, this post scores 42.
The easier a passage is to read, the higher the score on a scale of 0 – 100.