YouTube / iTunes / Spotify / Radio Public / Pocket Casts / Google Podcasts / Breaker / Overcast
Listen to ArtisanEnglish.jp posts & lesson intros here.
WotD: Alternative facts
In today’s political landscape, the term alternative facts has become controversial, clearly depicting the ongoing struggle over truth and reality in public conversation.
Introduced famously by a former US presidential advisor to Donald Trump (see below), alternative facts suggest that there can be multiple competing true facts about a single event or issue.
However, this concept has sparked a fierce debate about the integrity of information in politics.
When politicians present alternative facts, they often seek to reshape public perception, catering to specific audiences or agendas.
This phenomenon is not new, but its prominence in recent years has thrust the conversation about truth in politics into the spotlight.
As a result, voters must navigate a complex web of competing versions of the truth, trying to discern factual information from rhetoric woven with alternative facts.
The impact of alternative facts extends beyond the immediate political sphere.
They create distrust among the public, eroding confidence in traditional sources of news and information.
Media outlets, once considered reliable, are now often dismissed as biased, leading to the rise of echo chambers where only alternative facts that align with personal beliefs are accepted.
This environment complicates the functioning of democracy, as informed decision-making relies on shared truths.
Social media platforms exacerbate this issue, allowing the rapid spread of alternative facts and enabling misinformation to flourish.
Engaging with alternative facts requires critical thinking, skepticism, and a commitment to seek out reputable sources.
As citizens, we are responsible for calling out misinformation and demanding accountability from our leaders.
In an age where alternative facts have become a norm, the quest for objective truth is more vital than ever.
We can foster a healthier political conversation that prioritizes transparency and integrity by challenging the prevalence of alternative facts.
Only then can we rebuild trust in a system that thrives on clear and factual communication.
Flesch-Kincaid Readability Test
This post is likely to be understood by a reader with at least some college education, but it may not be easy to read.
On the Flesch-Kincaid reading-ease test, this post scores 34.
The easier a passage is to read, the higher the score on a scale of 0 – 100.